Sacramento city school district needs to get community involved in deciding future of closed schools
How can you help a depressed and blighted community if you don't ask the community what it wants?
By Cosmo Garvin
cosmog@newsreview.com
  |
Related stories:
Diane Ravitch on the great education-reform swindle This country's schools aren't failing. In fact, students are performing better than ever. SN&R, 10.03.13. Online schools a virtual reality in Sacramento New study questions student success, value of public funding. SN&R, 05.09.13. On the rise and fall (and rise and fall, again) of Franklin Boulevard Will life ever be mmm, mmm, good for one of Sacramento’s original suburbs? SN&R, 07.18.13. Sacramento city school-closure vote set for next week Sacramento's struggling neighborhoods feel bullied by city district's school-closure plan. SN&R, 02.14.13.
Advertisement
|
What’s a “7-11 committee,” you ask? And who cares?
Exactly.
The 7-11 group will recommend whether C.P. Huntington and six other schools, allclosed by the Sacramento City Unified School District earlier this year, should be turned into private schools or charter schools or reused for some other public purpose. The name is arcane, referring to the number of committee members. And the committee’s recommendation is just that—the SCUSD board has the ultimate power. But it’s a big decision, and these are valuable public assets, affecting whole communities.
Unfortunately, SCUSD has done very little effective outreach on school reuse. There’s a link on the district’s website and in its electronic newsletter, which says “7-11 committee meeting” and gives a date. If you click enough times, you can find out more, but as committee memberMichael Minnick noted, “Why would you click on it? Unless you were looking for aSlurpee?”
And so, no one showed up. The committee—all appointed members of the public, many connected in some way with education policy or local politics—asked questions of staff, mostly about process. There was a quick tour of the school. A couple of folks spoke on behalf of the private Camellia Waldorf School, which hopes to lease a “surplus” school site. That was the only proposal.
“I’m really disappointed in the outreach,” said SCUSD Board of Education memberDiana Rodriguez, who showed up near the end of the meeting. She said she wouldn’t have known about it if she hadn’t happened to see a flier for the meeting posted at another school site earlier that day. “When you have fewer than 10 people show up, we have to get more community input.”
Of course, community input didn’t amount to much when the school-board majority set its mind on closing all these schools (Rodriguez was opposed). And Bites suspects the district and certain board members already know exactly what they plan to do with at least some of the campuses. Doesn’t mean they should be left alone to do it.
The next 7-11 committee meeting is at Fruit Ridge Elementary on October 21, from 4:30 to 7:30 p.m. So far, the schedule is every Monday at that same time, though it may change. After Fruit Ridge comes Joseph Bonnheim, then Maple, Mark Hopkins, and Washington elementary schools
